🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.